Response:
The gender
inequality and bias in the sciences is very significant to focus on because it
has a great affect on the world's future, specifically in the field of science.
Women and men both have unique views of looking at situations and solving
problems and if you have an unequal amount of either one, it will be a
misrepresentation. According to the article, faculty from various universities
"rated the male applicant
as significantly more competent and hirable than the (identical) female
applicant." This lack of women presence in the selection creates an unfair
bias. In addition, there was also a greater salary and increased career
mentoring for males. Women usually fight for their equal rights, such as for suffrage;
however, why should they have to when women are just as capable as men are. This
inequality is unacceptable and actually puts society at a huge disadvantage
because women have various views that are different from men, thus those ideas
will not be public or help society because the woman is not in the position to
share them.
Women are specifically lower in
numbers in the subject of physics; however, in biology women play a more active
role. Positively, women are advancing in their field of biology; however, the
lack of desire in physics seems to be because mathematics, and problem solving
are mostly male dominated. When asked in an interview, men hardly mentioned the
idea of discrimination, whereas females do admittedly recognize it and want to
change it for the future. This lack of equality should be recognized and
supported by both males and females because it is harder for women to go
against males when they are already in a larger group, despite that both men
and women have the same capabilities. This effort will not only help women but
also the world of science as a whole, thus it is very important to encourage
the support of women. Overall, the gender struggle in the sciences is very
important in scientists' explanation about the gender differences in science.
Picture #1: http://www.rescorp.org/gdresources/uploads/images/staff/gentile_lg.jpg
James M. Gentile is the President, Research Corporation for Science Advancement.
Picture #2: https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ9JpK6tDW4P94tqt88X5kNNCmoiPcfybJLhmYmCH_Ckkp5rZAn
Study Title: Gender Segregation in Elite Academic Science,"
Funded By: National Science Foundation
Elaine Howard Ecklund, is in
the picture. She is the lead study author of and guide investigator. She is
also an associate professor of sociology at Rice University.
Picture #3: http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQI3YFi2IgCwtazw1NOO8_a5wC-NcCcvQ-ljKv9zRByq-jEaaf5
The first study was
published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. It "showed that
science professors at American research universities demonstrated bias against
women in hiring."
Picture #4: https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSrcR8jYz-28v3cSFWzqfbYAqW0GCQrKkPKuPSpo5kionfinOJS
The Research Corporation for Science Advancement (www.rescorp.org), is celebrating its 100th year. The CEO is James
M. Gentile.
Why Aren't There More Female Scientists? Various influential women speaking about women in the sciences.
No comments:
Post a Comment